Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00511
Original file (BC 2014 00511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00511

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, be corrected to reflect an “A” device on his Air Force 
Overseas Ribbon–Short (AFOR–S) as well as a separation medal 
recognizing his accomplishment from his last duty assignment.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was stationed at Thule Air Base, Greenland and is authorized 
the Artic “A” device on his AFOR-S for artic service.  

Prior to separating the applicant’s commander presented him a 
“Letter of Appreciation” for his service; however, he was 
informed by two Senior Noncommissioned Officers that he will 
receive a medal in the mail.  He never received it.

In support of his request, the applicant provides a letter 
detailing his responsibilities and assignments during his 
enlistment.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 10 Oct 
80.

On 1 Jun 92, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge, 
and was credited with 11 years, 7 months, and 22 days of active 
service.   

The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects the following Air Force 
Medals and/or Ribbons:  Air Force Commendation Medal with one 
Oak Leaf Cluster, Air Force Achievement Medal, Air Force 
Outstanding Unit Award, Air Force Organizational Excellence 
Award, Air Force Good Conduct Medal with two Oak Leaf Clusters, 
National Defense Service Medal, Humanitarian Service Medal, Air 
Force Overseas Ribbon – Short, Air Force Oversea Ribbon – Long, 
Air Force Longevity Service Award with one Oak Leaf Cluster, 
Noncommissioned Officers Professional Military Education 
Graduate Ribbon and Air Force Training Ribbon.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  Thule Air Base, Greenland does 
qualify for the Artic device; however the applicant served in 
the area of eligibility before the “A” device was authorized for 
wear on the AFOR-S rendering him ineligible for the award.  

They also completed a thorough review of the applicant’s 
official military personnel records and were unable to locate a 
medal for his last duty assignment.  While the applicant states 
he was told a medal would be mailed to him, he does not state 
any specific award or decoration but appears to be seeking a 
decoration.  In order for the applicant’s request to be 
reasonably considered he needs to provide a recommendation from 
someone with firsthand knowledge of the act/achievement, 
preferably someone from his chain of command, a proposed 
citation and eyewitness statements attesting to the 
act/achievement.   

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 22 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00511 in Executive Session on 10 Feb 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 Jan 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 11 Apr 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Sep 14.

						

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01354

    Original file (BC 2014 01354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01354 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he was awarded the Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR) and the Air Force Overseas Ribbon – Short Tour (AFOR-ST). The AFTR was established on 12 Oct 80, and is awarded to members who, after 14 Aug 74, complete an initial Air Force accession training program. Insufficient...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04091

    Original file (BC-2012-04091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the AM w/5BOLC, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The evidence of record indicates the applicant was awarded the AM four times (basic award...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01384

    Original file (BC 2014 01384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. As for his request for the AFOR-LT and AFTR, the applicant’s service dates are prior to the dates these awards were authorized. As for the applicant’s request to correct the DD Form 214 issued...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC 2008 04397

    Original file (BC 2008 04397.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By virtue of an DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Record, dated 30 Aug 13, the applicant is requesting award of the RVCM, CRM, VSM, Air Force Overseas Ribbon-Long Tour, Combat Service Commemorative and the Republic of Vietnam Service Commemorative. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice regarding the applicant’s request for award of the Combat Readiness Medal (CRM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03059

    Original file (BC 2014 03059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03059 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to add the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: a. The applicant’s DD Form 214s reflects the award of the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: - National Defense Service Medal - Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon - Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00628

    Original file (BC 2014 00628.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00628 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the award of the Air Combat Medal [sic]. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01547

    Original file (BC 2014 01547.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01547 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following Air Force Occupational Badge, Qualification Badge, and Medals: a. Combat Crewmember Qualification Badge c. Bosnia Combat Medal d. Croatia Combat Medal e. Serbia Combat Medal f. North Atlantic Treaty...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04754

    Original file (BC-2011-04754.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04754 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03366

    Original file (BC 2014 03366.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends disapproval for award of the Air Force Overseas Ribbon-Short Tour with one Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster and the Air Force Overseas Ribbon-Long Tour with two Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters. The applicant’s active duty service dates are from 14 Mar 58 to 31 Mar 78. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00247

    Original file (BC-2013-00247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The American Defense Service Medal is awarded to service members who served on active duty at any time between 8 Sep 1939 and 7 Dec 1941. The applicant's dates of service from 5 May 1964 to 3 May 1968, fall outside the eligibility dates for the AFOR issued for overseas service after 6 Jan 1986 and the American Defense Service Medal awarded for service between 8 Sep 1939 and 7 Dec 1941 and therefore render him ineligible for these awards. ...